デリダ派的シュティルナー再解釈？

シュティルナー関連で、とりあえずダウンロードしてあった数点をつまみ読む。その中の一つである書評、

Tracy B. Strong,“Fiction Knows No Noumenon”,Political Theory,April 2007,Vol.35,No.2,pp.223-230

で採り上げられている、

Susan McManus,Fictive Theories:Towards a Deconstructive and Utopian Political Imagination,New York and Houndsmills:Palgrave MacMillan,2005

が若干面白そう。

　She turns from there to Max Stirner. Attention to Stirner is rare these days and her chapter is worth reading if only for that. McManus likes Stirner for his understanding of the self as a “space for action,” thus as free over time (as opposed to the static and fixed self one finds in Hobbes). But Stirner is for her the Richard Rorty of the early nineteenth century: transformation remains a quality of the individual and has no viable collective dimension. She thus reads him as the flip-side of Marx (and gives us in passing a nice analysis of Derrida’s Spectres of Marx).

なるほどね、という感じかしら。評者曰く、著者は“lest-deconstructionists”に属するそうで。

そのうち読むけど、高いなぁ。

Fictive Theories: Towards a Deconstructive and Utopian Political Imagination (Studies in European Culture and History)